Frameworks

Core organization design frameworks.

We know the joke: consultants use way too many frameworks. But these are our favorites. Rooted in Jay Galbraith’s methodology and refined over years of practice, these are the essential models we rely on to guide our clients.

Corporate Function Design Options

Four ways to position a function, compared.

Charts below use Human Resources as the illustrative example function.

01 Fully Centralized
Advantages
  • Cost-effective, with consistent processes across the organization
  • Simplest structure to govern and staff
Disadvantages
  • Limited flexibility and responsiveness to business-specific needs
01
Fully Centralized

Every HR capability sits centrally, with no dedicated presence in the business lines.

Advantages
  • Cost-effective, with consistent processes across the organization
  • Simplest structure to govern and staff
Disadvantages
  • Limited flexibility and responsiveness to business-specific needs
02
Centralized, Dedicated Partner

Dedicated HR leads sit with each business line but still report back to the center.

Advantages
  • Combines central expertise with tailored support for each business line
Disadvantages
  • Dual reporting can create conflicts and coordination challenges
  • The business may not feel like it has enough control
03
Hybrid

Some HR capabilities stay central; others report solidly into the business line itself.

Advantages
  • Balances centralized efficiency with flexibility to meet business needs
Disadvantages
  • Risk of resource duplication and misalignment between central and local functions
04
Fully Embedded

Each business line runs its own full HR team, with no central function at all.

Advantages
  • Tailored, business-specific support with full business control
Disadvantages
  • Higher cost, and risk of inconsistent policy across business lines

Once the enterprise operating model is set, every corporate function faces its own positioning question: how much sits in the center versus in the business lines? There are four classic options along a spectrum. Each option strikes a different balance between centralized control and freedom in the business lines, and the same function can be positioned differently across companies, or shift over time as the business changes.

How we use it with clients

The starting point is the operating framework: how closely or loosely held the company is designed to be should drive how its functions are positioned, since a loosely held portfolio with heavily centralized functions (or the reverse) creates constant friction. From there, we work capability by capability rather than treating the function as one block, because the right answer often differs across the work: policy and transactional services may belong in the center while advisory roles embed in the business. The framework gives leaders a shared vocabulary for a debate that otherwise becomes a tug-of-war between corporate and the business lines.